In a world full of challenges like climate change and vaccine safety, trust in science becomes crucial.
In her revealing Ted talk, Naomi Oreskes questions the notion that science is simply a matter of blind faith. Rather than approaching science as a belief, Oreskes explores the relationship between science and faith, highlighting that for many, many scientific claims become an act of faith.
The talk dismantles the traditional scientific method, known as the hypothetical-deductive method, taught in schools. Oreskes points out the fallacy of affirming the consequent, where false theories can make true predictions, thus challenging the belief in the infallibility of the method.
From poorly conceived auxiliary hypotheses to the lack of technology to support predictions, science faces challenges that cannot be resolved through a pure deductive approach.
The use of models and simulations in science emerges as a crucial element. From physical models of the nineteenth century to complex modern computerized simulations, scientists seek to explain causes and effects. This suggests that science does not always follow a strict hypothetical-deductive path.
Science operates under the motto of "organized skepticism."
The burden of proof falls on those who make novel claims. Although science seeks truth, Oreskes highlights that radical shifts in scientific thinking are rare, underscoring the conservative nature of science.
At the end of this edition, Oreskes comments that trust in science should not be blind. Rather, it is based on the collective experience and organized skepticism of the scientific community.
To maintain this trust, scientists must effectively communicate how they obtain their knowledge, and the public must engage critically with the evidence presented.
Receive all industry news in our weekly Newsletter Scientific Dialectics.